13-Jan-2011

This is one of those emails that is both true and false.  Perhaps “false” is a little too strong, “misleading” might be a better descriptor

This email has been circulating recently and found its way to several club members.  When you are done, check at the bottom for the complete story.

 

Subject:  Military Pay Obama Style

These people should not be allowed to take their clothes off!
Ya gotta love these people.  Carol Browning's EPA proposals were rejected by Congress (Dems no less considered them outrageous)... now they announce they will go ahead by "administrative rules" and Legislate from the Executive.  .... Cindy Williams is just as qualified to do harm too. 
 
 

If you get this more than once, feel honored that you know more than one person who supports our military and appreciates what they do. 

If you don't forward it, you don't deserve their sacrifice.


 

CINDY WILLIAMS, Assistant Director for NATIONAL SECURITY in the Congressional Budget Office.....

Military Pay  

This is an Airman's response to Cindy Williams' editorial piece in the Washington Times about MILITARY PAY; it should be printed in all newspapers across America .  

 

Ms. Cindy William  wrote a piece for the Washington Times denouncing the pay raise(s) coming service members' way this year citing that she stated a 13% wage increase was more than they deserve.  

A young airman from Hill AFB responds to her article below. He ought to get a bonus for this.  

 

"Ms  Williams:

I just had the pleasure of reading your column, "Our GI's earn enough" and I am a bit confused. Frankly, I'm wondering where this vaunted overpayment is going, because as far as I can tell, it disappears every month between DFAS (The Defense Finance and Accounting Service) and my bank account. Checking my latest earnings statement I see that I make $1,117.80 before taxes per month. After taxes, I take home $874.20..  When I run that through the calculator, I come up with  an annual salary of $13,413.60 before taxes, and $10,490.40 after.  

I work in the Air Force Network Control Center where I am part of the team responsible for a 5,000 host computer network. I am involved with infrastructure segments, specifically with Cisco Systems equipment. A quick check under jobs for "Network Technicians" in the Washington , D.C. Area reveals a position in my career field, requiring  three years’ experience in my job. Amazingly, this job does NOT pay $13,413.60 a year. No, this job is being offered at $70,000 to $80,000 per annum............ I'm sure you can draw the obvious conclusions.  

Given the tenor of your column, I would assume that you NEVER had the pleasure of serving your country in her armed forces.  

Before you take it upon yourself to once more castigate congressional and DOD leadership for attempting to get the families in the military's lowest pay brackets off of WIC and food stamps, I suggest that you join a group of deploying soldiers headed for AFGHANISTAN ; I leave the choice of service branch up to you. Whatever choice you make though, opt for the SIX month rotation: it will guarantee you the longest possible time away from your family and friends, thus giving you full "deployment experience."

As your group prepares to board the plane, make sure to note the spouses and children who are saying good-bye to their loved ones. Also take care to note that several families are still unsure of how they'll be able to make ends meet while the primary breadwinner is gone. Obviously they've been squandering the "vast" piles of cash the government has been giving them.  

Try to deploy over a major holiday; Christmas and Thanksgiving are perennial favorites. And when you're actually over there, sitting in a foxhole, shivering against the cold desert night, and the flight sergeant tells you that there aren't enough people on shift to relieve you for chow, remember this: trade whatever MRE's (meal-ready-to-eat) you manage to get for the tuna noodle casserole or cheese tortellini, and add Tabasco to everything. This gives some flavor.  

Talk to your loved ones as often as you are permitted; it won't be nearly long enough or often enough, but take what you can get and be thankful for it. You may have picked up on the fact that I disagree with most of the points you present in your open piece.  

But, tomorrow from KABUL, I will defend to the death your right to say it.  

You see, I am an American fighting man, a guarantor of your First Amendment right and every other right you cherish...On a daily basis, my brother and sister soldiers worldwide ensure that you and people like you can thumb your collective noses at us, all on  a salary that is nothing short of pitiful and under conditions that would make most people cringe. We hemorrhage our best and brightest into the private sector because we can't offer the stability and pay of civilian companies.  

And you, Ms. Williams, have the gall to say that we make more than we deserve?  

A1C Michael Bragg,  Hill AFB AFNCC  


 

 

IF YOU AGREE,

PLEASE PASS THIS ALONG TO

AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE AND SHOW YOUR SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN FIGHTING MEN AND WOMEN.  

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

So, what is the real story?    The original article by Cindy Williams ran in the Washington Post on 12 January 2000 (click here to see a copy of the original article).  The original reply was from a real Airman Bragg and was copied and pasted soon thereafter to a number of newsgroup sites.  It has been circulating on the Internet since 2001.  Bragg’s reply was just one of many published replies from outraged military personnel.  Over the years, the reply has been tweaked to make it relevant; for example in the original reply from Airman Bragg, he suggests that Ms Williams deploy to Saudi Arabia.  The most recent version (Aug 2009) changes the airman’s base from Utah to Kabul and suggests deployment to Afghanistan.  There were also some versions where Cindy Williams was stated as the Cindy Williams from the sitcom “Laverne & Shirley”

The intent of the reply is still quite relevant and quite valid – Washington bureaucrats often fail to realize how difficult it is to live on the salaries paid to the military and it is those military personnel that defend the Washington bureaucrats and allow them to live high on the hog.  

How well do they live?  Per 2009 data, want to guess which state has the highest per capita income?  You guessed it – Washington, DC   

It is often true that people are paid vastly more or less than they are actually worth and Wash, DC is no exception and not unique.  We only have ourselves to blame … are any of the pro athletes or Hollywood types worth even 1% of what they are paid?  Not to this person!